Pierre Bourdieu's Distinction (1982) is the theoretical foundation of HabitusMatch. Bourdieu demonstrates how musical taste is not individual — but reproduces social position.
"Taste classifies — and it classifies the classifier." Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction (1982), p. 6
Habitus is the central concept: a system of lasting dispositions acquired through early socialization and structuring all perceptions, judgments, and actions. It is embodied capital — not consciously reflected but taken for granted.
The repetition structure of a listening list — which artists reappear, which genres dominate, which gaps exist — is for Bourdieu a direct expression of habitus. The model analyzes exactly these structural features.
Bourdieu distinguishes three basic forms of capital that together determine position in social space:
Musical taste is primarily an expression of cultural capital — and its specific structure: whether it was acquired more through institutional education or organic milieu immersion.
Bourdieu's praxeology as macro-micro bridge: Shows that in the NPO field economic capital dominates, while institutionalized cultural capital is less relevant than in for-profit sectors. Analysis of illusio, doxa, and hysteresis effects in nonprofit organizations.
For Bourdieu, the field is a structured social space with its own rules (doxa), where actors struggle over capital. Each field — the musical, the literary, the academic — has a specific illusio: the shared belief that the game is worth playing.
Habitus as "structuring structure" reproduces social inequality without actors being consciously aware of it. Musical taste is a direct habitus expression — not chosen, but embodied (Leguina, 2015; Whiting, 2021).
Hysteresis denotes the lag effect: Habitus adapts more slowly than the field changes. In music visible as continued imprinting from adolescent formative music — even when streaming radically transforms the field.
Doxa refers to unquestioned common sense within a field. In music: which genres are "culturally worthy" without being explicitly justified. Symbolic violence works because the dominated themselves recognize domination structures as legitimate.
Streaming platforms transform field structure faster than habitus dispositions can adapt. Algorithms as new field actors: they reproduce existing capital structures but can also create new distinction logics.
Barrière, L., & Finkel, R. (2020). The material culture of music festival fandoms. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25, 479–497.
Czech, G. (2009). The Theories of Pierre Bourdieu. Text fragment thesis. University of Economics Vienna.
Davies, S., & Rizk, J. (2017). The Three Generations of Cultural Capital Research. Review of Educational Research, 88, 331–365.
Hack-Polay, D. et al. (2023). Beyond Cultural Instrumentality. Sustainability.
Kingston, P. (2001). The Unfulfilled Promise of Cultural Capital Theory. Sociology of Education, 74, 88–99.
Leguina, A. (2015). Musical Distinctions in England. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 126, 28–45.
Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational Differences in Work Values. IJMR, 13, 79–96.
Schirone, M. (2023). Field, capital, and habitus. Quantitative Science Studies, 4, 186–208.
Torras-Gómez, E. et al. (2021). Challenging Bourdieu's Theory. SAGE Open, 11.
Whiting, S. (2021). The Value of Small Live Music Venues. Cultural Sociology, 15, 558–578.